32 posts tagged “os x”
|
I totally missed the Silver Anniversary of the Macintosh, which was yesterday (January 24). I confess I'm an enthusiastic late-comer to the world of Mac. The modern Mac probably has more in common with NeXT than its previous incarnations. That means UNIX under the hood.
That's perhaps what I really dig about them--that I can go to a prompt and be as geeky as I want to be, but, when I just need to deal with e-mail or edit an Excel spreadsheet, it just works.
Many folks are familiar with this commercial, which aired, as a commercial, just once nationally:
My iTunes library is something on the order of 12 GB. This includes iTunes Music Store purchases, things I ripped from my CDs, etc. For the most part, this is synced to my older 30 GB iPod. Though there are some ways to get the data back to a local drive, I never bothered to look into them.
However, backups have been on my mind. We got a MyBook World Edition, to provide some RAID-protected space for backups and archiving over my LAN. Still, given that I regularly copy my iTunes library to my iPod makes it frustrating to me to give up the space and develop a process to back up that library.
This week, coincidentally, a blog pointed me to iTunesFS. This is built upon Google's MacFUSE. What it does is allow you to mount your iTunes library as a file system.
On its face, it doesn't sound that impressive--you can browse your iTunes library, after all. However, it build it based on the "iTunes Music Library.xml" file. Cool things happen. For instance, playlists, normally just a list of songs, show up as folders. I can drag all the files to another media en mass.
The other cool thing is that the iPod can be mounted and copied from. Again, this is something normally not possible. And, again, things can be copied around. Like, say, from a live iPod to a resurrected MacBook.
This is something that probably fairly specialized applications, and is read only. But my solution to backing up my iTunes library (without being redundant of existing processes) is found!
I just installed Darwine on my OS X laptop. Most unholy.
For those who don't know, Darwine is an API that allows Windows applications to be run on Intel Macs. Though I couldn't get anything to complicated to run, I was able to pull a few simple applications an run them. For instance, here is the (in)famous MS Paint:
Much has been made of a recently announced Trojan Horse affecting OS X. "See--Macs aren't secure, either."
Though I don't believe that any platform is inherently safe, consider what it takes for this one to gain access to a Mac:
- Navigate to certain sites (these happen to be porn sites)
- Explicitly choose to download a codec.
- Open a disk image file
- Launch an installer
- Give the installer your administrator (root) password
This requires a lot of action on the part of the user. In contrast, I personally experienced getting Spyware (a Trojan's first cousin) on a Window's box and Internet Explorer just by executing only step #1 (going to a site--not necessarily a porn site).
Further, there are a lot of legitimate programs that require access at the level this Trojan does. Installing an HP printer driver, for instance, is a system modification that requires giving your root password.
Again, I am not saying that OS X (or any other flavor of UNIX, or a UNIX-like operating system (Linux), or VMS) is invulnerable. However, I'd say that so much was required (and so much action on the part of the user), that OS X is more secure relative to other platforms. Users should still be vigilant and take steps to be secure, but they are definitely have a firm foundation.
I'm an OS guy. My career in IT has mostly been on infrastructure, dealing mostly with systems administration. I was part of the team that made one of the first Windows 95 migrations in Cincinnati. I've worked with a variety of platforms (Windows, NetWare, Linux, and OS/2), but upgrading to Leopard was my first upgrade of OS X.